Understanding the accommodating intraocular lens gay dating simulation
Trials scoring 6 or more, out of a maximum possible score of 10, were considered to be of adequate quality.
Secondary outcomes of interest were pilocarpine-induced anterior chamber displacements, reading speed, glare, contrast sensitivity, spectacle independence, and adverse effects.
Trial locations included France, Italy, Austria, Germany, Japan and the UK.
Two reviewers independently selected the studies, with any disagreements resolved by consensus.
The quality of the included trials was assessed using a modified version of the van Tulder validity assessment tool.
Given the poor quality and significant heterogeneity between the included trials, this conclusion was appropriate.
MEDLINE (1950 to 2008), the Cochrane Library and Clinical were searched to October 2008; search terms were reported.
This well-conducted systematic review compared accommodating intraocular lens and monofocal intraocular lens in restoring accommodation in cataract surgery.
The authors concluded that there was no clear evidence of near acuity improvement with accommodating intraocular lens.