Dating earth cast


05-Oct-2016 21:01

0) { document.write(" [" + num Subjective + " subjective "); if (num Subjective == 1) document.write("question"); else document.write("questions"); document.write(" not graded]"); } document.writeln(""); document.writeln(""); document.close(); return(false); } function Get Response(answer Index, answer) { var list Index; var response Text; if (list At(answer Index) == "1") { list Index = answer.selected Index; response Text = answer.options[list Index].text; } else response Text = answer.value; return(response Text); } function Score Answer(answer Index, response Text) { var list Index; var answer Text; answer Text = ans Map[answer Index]; if (qtype At(answer Index) == "4") return(Numeric Compare(response Text, answer Text)); else if (qtype At(answer Index) == "5") return(Multi Compare(response Text, answer Text)); else if (response Upper Case() == answer Upper Case()) return(true); else return(false); } function Build Prefix Text(answer Index, response Text, is Correct) { var text; var list Index; text = "= 0 && At(i) == " "; --i) len = i; if (len == 0) s = ""; else if (len !101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe is an extensive list of arguments for young Earth creationism (YEC), compiled by Don Batten in June 2009 for Creation Ministries International (CMI). The apparent intent of the article is to help other creationists struggling with cognitive dissonance, and for use as a conversion tool.Almost every reference link in the original article either goes directly to creationist sources, or to popular science magazines which support creationism.In the few cases where reputable peer-reviewed scientific papers are cited, their content is severely misrepresented or incorrectly interpreted.Ultimately, the article seeks to persuade by force of numbers, rather than force of argument.

Although age indicators are called "clocks" they aren't, because all ages result from calculations that necessarily involve making assumptions about the past.

Always the starting time of the "clock" has to be assumed as well as the way in which the speed of the clock has varied over time.

A list of arguments broken down by fallacy is presented at the end of this page.

Although the list claims to have 101 points, several are just reworded duplicates and one is even a copy of the preceding item.

dating earth cast-25

Real lve cam

Further, it has to be assumed that the clock was never disturbed.

The assumptions conventionally used in obtaining scientific estimates of the age of the Earth and the universe look supremely cautious compared to such a leap of faith.